Comparison Between Unit Cost Results of The ABC Method And INA-CBGs Rates For BPJS Patients With Caesarea Sectio Action at Rumah Sakit Graha Sehat Probolinggo

Susanti Sugianto; Yanuar Ramadhan; Erry Yudhya Mulyani; Rokiah Kusumapradja; Nofierni Nofierni

doi:10.62027/vitamedica.v2i4.201

Authors

Susanti Sugianto Universitas Esa Unggul
Yanuar Ramadhan Universitas Esa Unggul
Erry Yudhya Mulyani Universitas Esa Unggul
Rokiah Kusumapradja Universitas Esa Unggul
Nofierni Nofierni Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62027/vitamedica.v2i4.201

Keywords:

caesarean section, unit cost, ABC method, BPJS, JKN KIS, INA-CBGs rates

Abstract

Delivery using the caesarean section method is one of the JKN-KIS services which has experienced a significant increase in cases from year to year at Graha Sehat Probolinggo Hospital. The general tariff applied by the hospital is IDR 10,800,000, which is 206.15%, far above the INA CBGs tariff of IDR 5,238,800, making the hospital feel the need to carry out descriptive quantitative research using the ABC method and DD method. Then the unit cost results of the ABC method are compared with the INA-CBGs rates. The results of this research show that the unit cost of the ABC method is IDR 5,484,214, which is IDR 245,414 (4.68%) greater than the INA-CBGs tariff. The potential efficiency that can be achieved results in savings of IDR 665,295 so it is hoped that the unit cost of the ABC method will be IDR 4,818,919. IDR 419,881 (8.01%) smaller than the INA-CBGs tariff. The conclusion is that there is a negative difference between the unit costs of the ABC method and the DD method and the INA CBGs rates. Hospitals should submit a tariff review to BPJS, including a review of the provision of separate tariffs for baby handling costs. Apart from that, hospitals also need to make efficiencies by reducing length of stay, reviewing medical services, efficiency in laundry units and CSSD, speeding up RME, as well as efficiency in several other resources while still prioritizing patient safety

References

Baker J. (1998) Activity-based Costing and Activity-Based Management for Health Care. United States: Aspen Publisher,

Barlia Annis Syahzuni. (2020) Application of activity based-costing system in determining cost of production. Superior One, unpublished

Edward J. Blocher, Kung H. Chen, Gary Cokins and Thomas W. Lin. (2008) Cost management (Fourth Edition ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill,

Hansen dan Mowen. (2009) Akuntansi Manajemen.. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers,

Horngren, Srikat M Datar. (2012) Cost accounting a managerial emphasis. England: Pearson,

Karahan Gokmen. (2020) Activity Based Costing in Health Institutions: An Application in Gynecology Clinic of a Public Hospital. [Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences , 5(1) 112-121,].

Klos et al. (2020) Cost analysis of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and the risk factors for their increased cost in a public insurance health care system e Single centre study. [European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 46 (2020) 607-612,]

Maulana Haqim R, P. F. (2019). Unit Cost Analysis of Sectio Caesarea with Activity-Based Costing in Yogyakarta City Hospital. Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit , DOI: 10.18196/jmmr.8183.

Mogyorosy Zsolt, Smith Peter. (2005) The main methodological issues in costing health care services. University of York. York United Kingdom: Centre For Health Economic (CHE),

Robin Cooper, Robert S Kaplan. (1998) The design of management systems . New Jersey: Prentice Hall,