The Effectiveness of the GEPSI Electronic Library on the Knowledge of Communities in 3T (Disadvantaged, Frontier, and Outermost) Areas in Indragiri Hilir Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62027/praba.v4i2.748Keywords:
3T areas, Digital Literacy, E-Library, Information Access, KnowledgeAbstract
The development of information technology has encouraged the emergence of electronic library innovations as a solution to improve community literacy, particularly in 3T (Disadvantaged, Frontier, and Outermost) areas with limited access to information. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the GEPSI Electronic Library in improving community knowledge in Tanjung Pidada Village, Tempuling District, Indragiri Hilir Regency. This research employed a quasi-experimental design using a one-group pre-test and post-test approach. The sample consisted of 30 respondents selected through total sampling technique. Data were collected using pretest and posttest questionnaires and analyzed statistically to determine differences before and after the intervention. The results showed that prior to the intervention, the majority of respondents had poor knowledge (73.3%), while after using the GEPSI e-library, most respondents were categorized as having good knowledge (73.3%). Statistical analysis indicated a p-value of 0.000 (p < 0.05), demonstrating a significant difference between pretest and posttest scores. It can be concluded that the GEPSI Electronic Library is effective in improving community knowledge in 3T areas. This program has the potential to become an innovative strategy for equalizing information access and enhancing community literacy.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dale, E. (1969). Audio-visual methods in teaching (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2023). IFLA guidelines for library services in the digital age. IFLA. https://www.ifla.org
Mudassir. (2025). Pengembangan perpustakaan elektronik dalam meningkatkan literasi informasi masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan, 12(1), 45–56.
Notoatmodjo, S. (2014). Ilmu perilaku kesehatan. Rineka Cipta.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suli, S., Rahmawati, D., & Prasetyo, A. (2003). Perpustakaan digital dan akses informasi di daerah terpencil. Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 27(2), 101–110.
UNESCO. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M., & Van Dijk, Jan A. G. M.. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
World Bank. (2022). Digital development overview: Expanding access to digital opportunities. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Praba : Jurnal Rumpun Kesehatan Umum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




